By Janet Jaiswal, Senior Director of Product Marketing —
In
part one of this series on Net Promoter Score, I discussed some of the common complaints I heard from colleagues at the first-annual Customer Experience Professionals Association (CXPA) conference. Surprisingly enough, these complaints came from companies that had implemented NPS and were disappointed that it didn't help them achieve their goals of creating satisfied customers that would become more loyal patrons and even advocates of their brands over time.
Enter Customer Experience Management
According to Wikipedia,
Customer Experience Management is a strategy that focuses the operations and processes of a business around the needs of the individual customer. The term 'Customer Experience Management' also represents the discipline, methodology and/or process used to comprehensively manage a customer's cross-channel exposure, interaction and transaction with a company, product, brand or service." Customer experience management solutions provide strategies, process models, and information technology to design, manage and optimize the end-to-end customer experience process.
One of the key features of successful CEM implementations is their ability to manage multi-channel interactions. Customer experience solutions address the cross-channel (contact center, Internet, self service, mobile devices, brick and mortar stores), cross-touchpoint (phone, chat, email, Web, in-person), and cross-lifecycle (ordering, fulfillment, billing, support, etc.) nature of the customer experience process.
NPS and CEM: A Comparison
Now that we have a standard definition of CEM, let's compare it to Net Promoter Score to further our understanding their merits and how they complement each other. Because I know the Tealeaf CEM solution well, I will use to as a way to illustrate what a CEM solution can do and address some of the complaints about NPS in my earlier posts.